Is this a real Shelby?

Kinja'd!!! "Funktheduck" (funktheduck)
04/01/2015 at 21:09 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 13
Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!!

best I could get because of traffic. It had a hood scoop with a "302" badge. It sounded like a 302 but I thought old Shelby's had bigger engines. It had a cobra badge on the front fender. That rear spoiler is awful. I love old cars regardless of make. I'm partial to old mustangs especially. This one just looked wrong.


DISCUSSION (13)


Kinja'd!!! 505Turbeaux > Funktheduck
04/01/2015 at 21:13

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

passenger is facepalming knowing you caught them out

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! StoneCold > Funktheduck
04/01/2015 at 21:19

Kinja'd!!!1

Shelby cars only had 302s in 1968, but that generation of Shelby had Thunderbird/Cougar lights on it

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! StoneCold > StoneCold
04/01/2015 at 21:22

Kinja'd!!!0

But it is definitely a 1968 with those side marker lights.

Also, I never like that much chrome on the wheels, anthracite/grey Torq Thrusters are always better:

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Frank Grimes > StoneCold
04/01/2015 at 21:27

Kinja'd!!!0

this was my first thought.


Kinja'd!!! Funktheduck > StoneCold
04/01/2015 at 21:32

Kinja'd!!!0

That's why it looks so wrong. The tail lights. Thank you


Kinja'd!!! Funktheduck > 505Turbeaux
04/01/2015 at 21:33

Kinja'd!!!0

She was playing with her hair. She kept adjusting it despite the fact that she's in a convertible.


Kinja'd!!! 505Turbeaux > Funktheduck
04/01/2015 at 21:41

Kinja'd!!!0

nah, just the facepalm. Let me sleep easy tonight


Kinja'd!!! Funktheduck > 505Turbeaux
04/01/2015 at 21:45

Kinja'd!!!1

Facepalm. At least it wasn't as awkward as when I took a picture of that K900 or whatever it was and noticed the guy after the fact was staring right at me with a "WTF are you doing" look


Kinja'd!!! Jay Lauer > StoneCold
04/01/2015 at 21:48

Kinja'd!!!0

Shelby's did not have 302s in '68.


Kinja'd!!! StoneCold > Jay Lauer
04/01/2015 at 22:22

Kinja'd!!!1

Ummm. Yes, J-codes were the standard engine:

http://mustangattitude.com/cgi-bin/statse…

https://myclassicgarage.com/marketplace/kn…

http://www.mustangspecs.com/years/68shelby…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_Mu…


Kinja'd!!! StoneCold > StoneCold
04/01/2015 at 22:49

Kinja'd!!!0

Scraaaatch that, it's a '69 with those jewel-type tail lights; '68s were flatter. That silly ducktail thing was throwing me off :/


Kinja'd!!! RedPir8Roberts > StoneCold
04/01/2015 at 23:40

Kinja'd!!!0

You could also get the 428 Police Interceptor motor in the GT500, and 428 Cobra Jet in the 500KR "King of the Road." The convertibles also had a factory rollbar covered with a plastic aero sheath which the pictured car lacks. Those also look like 1969 taillights, not 1968s, as already pointed out they would have been replaced by Thunderbird sequential units in a real Shelby.


Kinja'd!!! StoneCold > RedPir8Roberts
04/02/2015 at 00:08

Kinja'd!!!0

http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/scraaaatch-tha…

Yup, it was bugging me; the tail thing was throwing me off with the tail lights. Yes, you could get those, but Funktheduck was asking about if Shelby cars specifically had 302s ever.